The Supreme Court showed uncertainty over how to limit nationwide injunctions in a case stemming from blocks to President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order.

The arguments focused on whether federal district court judges can rule against the administration on a nationwide basis.

The Trump administration’s brief against the Fourteenth Amendment is a bad one, and it naturally led to some tortured legal ...

The Supreme Court gave a skeptical hearing Thursday to a lawyer for President Trump who was appealing rulings that blocked his plan to deny citizenship to newborns ...

President Trump's agenda against birthright citizenship is in the hands of the Supreme Court tonight as the justices debate whether federal judges can issue sweeping injunctions to block his executive ...

The Supreme Court is reviewing President Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship, focusing on the power of federal ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the Trump administration's challenge to birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court will ...

Will the Supreme Court stop radicals in robes from subverting the president and imperiling the separation of powers via rule ...

Justice Alito pointed out that multiple states have also sued over the birthright citizenship order and won broader victories ...

Throughout U.S. and Wisconsin history, the idea of who gets to be a citizen has changed. At times, it’s been broad and ...

In a case involving changes to birthright citizenship, the justices heard arguments on whether a single federal judge in a ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments in one of the most consequential cases of the year. It involves the ability for President ...